1990’s The End of Real Innovation and Growth.

June 19, 2018

 Brief: Innovation, growth and human development are closely correlated. Today’s youth are losing their cognitive abilities and problems of today are not with innovation but excessive experimentation.

  • 1990’s is when we saw the last bouts of real innovation, 1990’s is also the time frame witnessed when Youth IQ levels have been dropping.  The world is indeed dumber and in the quest to access and justify capital, startups and companies tend to pitch artificial intelligence, big data, and autonomous systems simultaneously, when its factual Machines Do Not Think and possibly never will.
  • Computing is an execution of systematic codes and programs, they do not have intuition in pattern recognition, which is essentially a key component for innovation.
  • The End of Innovation in the 1990’s and the peak of economic growth is correlated and many of the problems we witness today is not due to innovation but rather excessive experimentation which is having disastrous consequences on society.
  • As part of a series to delve into these insane experiments, In part 1 we attempt to explain what is real innovation and growth. In part two we delve into the deeper workings of Artificial Intelligence and to explain how unintelligent these systems can be, yet this doesn’t stop experiments into various systems which are purportedly flawed and it continues by those just to be proven right (BIAS) at the huge costs of time and capital, while at the same time unleashing disruptive and destructive conditions on the global economy.
  • Use of Smart Phones and dependence on technology are making the youth of today lose their cognitive abilities and the main cause of youths unemployment- Daniel Mankani

 


1990’s and The End of Real Innovation and growth.

In 1434 Johannes Gutenberg, a goldsmith by profession developed a printing system by adapting existing technologies for printing purposes. In 1712 it was Thomas Newcomen with his “atmospheric-engine” who can be said to have brought together most of the essential elements established by earlier inventors.

Thomas Edison played an instrumental role in the development of the telephone. Edison had been working on methods for sending two messages simultaneously over a single wire for many years. In 1872, after Western Union adopted Joseph Stearns’s duplex for sending two messages in opposite directions, company president William Orton hired Edison to invent and patent other methods “as an insurance against other parties using them.” While working on duplex telegraphs, Edison realized that he could send four messages simultaneously by combining the duplex with a diplex for sending two messages in the same direction.
In 1875, with a contract from Western Union, Edison began work on the acoustic telegraph, which used tuning forks to send telegraphic messages at different frequencies at the same time. He would use this money to build Menlo Park. From this work on acoustic telegraphy, which he pursued at the same time as Alexander Graham Bell, came the telephone, which relied on Edison’s research, and the phonograph, which was inspired by the potential to replicate the sounds of acoustic telegraphy.

It was Edison’s Carbon Microphone in the receiver that was licensed by Bell and remained in telephones for more than a century. By 1876 Alexander Graham Bell is credited with the development of the first practical telephone, who too recognized the contributions of earlier inventors and with that came we got the Phonograph in 1877 and the lightbulb in 1878.

All these inventions effectively led to enhanced economic activity and an improvement into human conditioning, which prior to were a drag on society and economic participation limited to agrarian communities as men slogged at the farms while women in charge of the households were mostly left to draw water from distances, doing laundry which took up two days in a week and without electricity it meant hard laborious conditions for day to day life.

In 1903 the Wright brothers achieved the first powered, sustained and controlled airplane flight and two years later they broke their own milestones when they flew their first practical airplane, here again, made possible by drawing upon findings from earlier inventors and their observations.

By 1941 a new device came along which could be instructed to carry out sequences of arithmetic or logical operations automatically or via program codes and this became the first computing machines whose costs of ownership were prohibitively very high and were only used by governments for record keeping and instantaneous calculations.

In 1965 Gordon Moore observed the trend at which transistors chips were evolving made a prediction in his paper described a doubling every year in the number of components per integrated circuit and projected this rate of growth would continue for at least another decade. In 1975, looking forward to the next decade, he revised the forecast to doubling every two years.

And by late 1970’s and as predicted by Moore’s Law we saw the advent of the microcomputers and with affordability came mass adoptions of these machines. But these machines were standalone independently working machines thereby as a means to natural progression saw the advent of the Internet, allowing connectivity and collaboration as a means for enhanced efficiency.

Beginning from the early inventions in the 2nd century until the creation of the Internet in the 1990’s, all of the inventions were addressing problems for which there were no other real alternatives. They were fulfilling a real gap market demand followed with their efficient uses and instrumental problem solving, new industries sprung around them, and they had a powerful impact for all mankind, where human life and conditioning vastly improved.

These Real Inventions are in use even today and they can never be dislodged. With the end of these innovations, global growth collapsed and has been tepid since the early 1990’s. The end of real innovations has brought us to a stage of disruptive inventions which are cannibalistic in nature and as solutions to problems where none are required yet have a profound market impact and are reversing some of the positive traits built up in the past and are very destructive in their approach, affecting human conditioning not for the better but towards the worst.

Innovation and Growth

The wider implications of all innovations are strongly correlated between technological advances and the betterment of human life. For example, the Agricultural Revolution which occurred between 1750-1900 produced a transformation of human society brought about by the invention of the plough, making large-scale agriculture production possible. There was also a widespread replacement of manual labor by machines during the Industrial Revolution.

The Invention of the plough didn’t make the cows who plowed the fields obsolete but in fact, they had a positive impact where their old structural uses were enhanced and were made ready for other more efficient uses. Similarly, the impact of paper on record keeping, the compass for navigational purposes and the printing presses as an incremental innovation created, even more, uses for paper.

The Industrial Revolution too brought about much economic improvement for most people in Industrial Societies and many also enjoyed greater prosperity and improved conditions, modern industrial life also provided a constantly changing flood of new goods and services giving consumers more choices, which in turn provided employment opportunities for those displaced by the transformation of the agricultural societies.

Innovation can be classified as Breakthrough, Incremental, Game Changing and Disruptive.

Breakthrough Innovation:  Often referred to as “revolutionary science” because it involves a paradigm shift.  In this case, the problem is well defined, but the path to the solution is unclear, usually because those involved in the domain have hit a wall. Paper, Transistors and the discovery of the structure of many molecules including DNA are both good examples of breakthrough innovation.

Incremental Innovation: (sometimes referred to as sustaining innovation) uses existing forms as a starting point and either makes incremental improvements to something or some process or it reconfigures it so that it may serve some other purpose.

While Breakthrough and Incremental Innovations have a substantial impact in technological advancement and are directly correlated with the advancement of human conditioning and economy, Game Changing and Disruptive Innovations, on the other hand, are not well defined nor can be considered as a new scientific innovation but rather delivers the same repackaged in a different manner.

Game Changing Innovation: For Instance, Apple’s iPhone is not a new scientific Breakthrough Innovation but uses a combination of existing technologies such as the camera, the computer or the many components of the smartphone which were incorporated to create another phone, thereby making it just a game-changing innovation. The iPhone is also not an Incremental Innovation as that of printing press creating efficient enhancing uses of the paper, it did not make any of its components more efficient.

Disruptive Innovations: The term was defined and first analyzed by the American scholar Clayton M. Christensen and his collaborators beginning in 1995 and has been called the most influential business idea of the early 21st century and defines Disruptive Innovation as one that creates a new market by providing a different set of values, which ultimately (and unexpectedly) overtakes an existing market. In business, a Disruptive Innovation is an innovation that creates a new market and value network and eventually disrupts an existing market and value network, displacing established market-leading firms, products, and alliances.

Beyond business and economics, Disruptive Innovations can also be considered to disrupt complex systems, including economic and business-related aspects. The business environment of market leaders does not allow them to pursue Disruptive Innovations when they first arise, because they are not profitable enough at the start and because their development can take scarce resources away from sustaining innovations (which are needed to compete against current competition) and due to these innovations not clearly being defined, they may never be profitable and carry a much higher risk than every other type of innovation.

Real Breakthrough Innovations and growth go hand in hand. With computing came the internet in 1990’s and this is to be considered as the last bouts of real inventions the world has ever seen, Global Growth to has faltered in the 1990’s, first with the collapse of the Japanese Economy and the rise of China {cannibalistic}, this being not much different than Japan in the 1980’s. In fact, many of the trade issues we see today between China and USA are about the same of what we witnessed between Japan and USA then.

The innovations since 1990’s have mostly been computer related, which is to follow generalized sets of operations, called programs. These programs enable computers to perform an extremely wide range of tasks, which the newfound computing capabilities could perform well, first as a means of efficient record keeping, storage and with that effective collaboration of these informational data across multiple channels via the Internet.

Out of these new means of efficient storage and communication, Information Technology was born which in turn provided the ability for managers of such systems to identify repetitive and often redundant processes whose removal created new value chains of efficiency.

These new computing innovations while delivering informational competencies, their deployment was destructive in their approach and threatened every set of old established structural system, initially their value proposition was mainly positive as the benefits were visible in the overall bottom line of the organizations who deployed them in the form of enhanced productivity, service, efficiency and or sales, often referenced as Value Chains yet they were cannibalistic in their approaches.

While smartphones and related mobile technologies are recognized as flexible and powerful tools that, when used prudently, can augment human cognition, there is also a growing perception that habitual involvement with these devices has a negative and lasting impact on users’ ability to think, remember, pay attention, and regulate emotion.

As portable media devices, such as smartphones, have become an increasingly pervasive part of human lives, they have also become increasingly capable of supplementing, or even supplanting, various mental functions. With the capacity to be used as phonebooks, appointment calendars, internet portals, tip calculators, maps, gaming devices, and much more, smartphones seem capable of performing an almost limitless range of cognitive activities for humans and by doing so limiting humans own cognitive skills in a case of use it or lose it.

Moore’s Law, an observation of pattern recognition and Intuition.

As observed on Moore’s Law on the level of Transistors on integrated circuit chips, if human’s cognitive skills are in decay and reversing then surely this is not a good thing for society and this is reflective of the lack of jobs for today’s youth as they remain poorly equipped despite having participated in higher levels of education and the problem is not with the availability of jobs but the availability of the skills sets they have to offer.

In Business too, these informational technological systems have created havoc by deploying an arbitrage edge for themselves often at the costs of society. Value Creation is a concrete concept which none of these new technologies seem to deliver. The end of innovation in the 1990’s and the beginning of experimentation is at the root of our problems.


Further Reading
Animal Spirits, Bubbles, Mania’s and Market Peaks. http://ul3.com/FIl46
FOMO Signs of the Euphoric. The Bust is almost near! http://ul3.com/6K2S3
BITCOIN – A Fraud and Ponzi in a Disillusioned World: http://ul3.com/35fH1
The Greed: http://ul3.com/pUDgd
The Hope: http://ul3.com/CuC7d
The Ignorant, Zombies: http://ul3.com/PP8Ez
Perception vs Reality: http://ul3.com/UcYb1
Revolutionary Transformation Ongoing. http://ul3.com/kcYCE 
– Global Economic Collapse January 18, 2016

Call it a Revolution, If you will. A fightback is on the cards. Daniel Mankani

October 22, 2017

There are substantial issues on hand that are pressing, complacency of no other kind, talent development and human management needs to pick up speed and efficiency or there will be chaos.

Call it a Revolution, if you will. Human Talent, Tech Development needs efficiency and speed to succeed – Daniel Mankani

Please allow me to explain.

In 2003, when we launched our first book, which is a classical story of the initial days of the Internet, whose history, is very important we document and we did, outlying the dot com collapse, right up to the date it peaked and its subsequent years and challenges thereafter. Those were indeed very harsh times that followed and the peak and its bust was a surprise to many, governments, venture capitalist, the general public, even the smartest guys like us, all were suckered into it at the same time.  The Outcome of which is Technopreneurship, the successful entrepreneur in the new economy. today, we wish we paid more attention to the chapter 15; “Role for Society in technopreneurship development.”

Today, its no different.

The time has once again arrived where we are witnessing the secondary main peak of euphoria and complacency and all those fears highlighted in our first book are coming back to haunt us. What it takes to be a successful entrepreneur, was not written by an academic but as a trade book, with real life experiences on how to start up your own internet venture and be successful. Experience has taught us there is no other short cuts from hard / smart work, its only via practicing and failing long enough that open’s up the real knowledge to succeeding.

Automation is picking up speed and there is a good reason behind this, but before we get to this, lets understand what this automation is really doing, its programming the human mind into becoming zombies. There is a huge risk of mental imbalance occurring across the planet and maybe its time for us to realize that the programs only have one purpose, which is to manipulate minds.

Most people only visit ten websites max, day in and day out and its these top ten websites which rake in most of the traffic whilst others have to pay a fee to get access to this traffic. Hence The Gatekeepers. The rest of the treasure trove of knowledge buried much below but many neither have the time, motivation of discipline to explore.

Just look at google, couple of guys wiring together hundreds of machines and building an index, then offering that index as a search engine is fine.

Once they go public, see what happens next.

They become gatekeepers in other words wanting to control everything. The earlier mission statement of Don’t be Evil doesn’t exist.

What was the mission of Facebook, lets be clear and honest about this? Wasn’t it about controlling the human mind and make a zombie out of them and wasn’t it build by a secret organization, that is part of the CIA, NSA.

Can anyone deny this please?

Rumors of facebook been a US Government Surveillance tool made China to create their own. Today, governments are reading everything, the internet is live connected, your devices are live connected, your location known at any given time. You gave them the keys to everything, your privacy doesn’t exist and if you have a camera in your device and a backdoor to the root, then you gave them your view of you in your bathroom as well. How crazy can this be?

Although these are the largest tech companies and have created value on their own in various ways for communities, its their next source of activities is which is causing more mental harm by trying to control thought via perception, turning many into zombies like a swarm of bees of common thought into a collective action for more.

Ideology has great power to convert your best friends into enemies. countries fall and kingdoms disappear when ideologies control human minds. This trend is rapidly increasingly and we see substantial challenges and deterioration in every aspect of human life and economy.

Living in imaginary illusionary lives on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and various online communities, enhancing self ego which begets bigger ego’s, the smallest people have the greatest need to express their validity but real life is totally different and yet it looks so real, devolving into a public spat’s,  more common than anytime before and once it turns ugly, heading down hill pretty past, exposing many things that were never known before.

Everyone is affected. People are losing their minds and going off balance very fast, once this happens, chaos reigns next without knowing how and what caused it in the first place.

Where is the productive personalities that we all want to see and be?, Where is the value creating technology revolution delivering and enhancing of processes and the need to be more productive that we can be. It is after all one life and one shot at it. Instead of what we have is totally unproductive and sometimes a complete wasteful life.

Human evolution has to evolve with its consciousness, the necessities of understanding and self purpose.

Artificial Intelligence by itself has no intelligence on its own, what it rather is, is a set of algorithmic codes running a indexing numbering system based upon which a second set of instructions are undertaken, a simplest form to understand Artificial Intelligence is to realize that its a set of data, possibly even personal to you, based upon which recommendations are made towards you.

A simplest example on how it works on you, is per-determining and recommending based on your past behavior.

Have you ever seen, “We think you may be interested in the following article” or “This may be of interest to you.”, These recommendations are AI.

To reiterate once again, Artificial Intelligence is not intelligence at all, but its based on data and probabilities. For example, if you wanted to create a automated bot of yourself, you will first create a database with a set of data within and create a relationship with queries and give them a ranking of some form based on those rankings, the next outcome is determined, Now you can refer to these as some sort of intelligence, but this is no match to the intelligence of the human mind.

The Internet is semantic and everything online is relating to language or logic in some form, these relationships determine activities for a program to undertake and execute but none of this is rocket science, yet can be driven towards own self interest or greater good for those who are in the know. The concern is the state of affairs for many of those who don’t even know, they are been programmed. Its the distortion of such behaviors that the problem, we are concerned about.

Today, the entire world is invested in the FAANG’S and we don’t think it will always be like this. There will be a fightback from Small Medium Enterprises and from New Technopreneurs, its just impossible that a winners of today are winners of tomorrow as well. Never has been never will be.

The fight back will come and it will take market share off the current established structures, Call it a Revolution, if you will.

FAANG’s | {Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Alphabet’s Google}

We are attending WEB SUMMIT 2017 in Lisbon.
Get to know us.

technopreneurship_Daniel-Mankani

Technopreneurship – The Successful Entrepreneur in the New Economy – Daniel Mankani. Published 2003. Pearson Education Asia – All rights, copyright reserved Daniel Mankani { ISBN0-13-046545-3 }

Chapter The (False) Hope >>> Technopreneurship-The Successful Entrepreneur In The New Economy.

LINKS
Disclaimer. http://ul3.com/L30qH
Back to the Beginning. http://ul3.com/aeVUG
BTAMSC – http://ul3.com/vAqdH
The Greed: http://ul3.com/pUDgd
The Hope: http://ul3.com/CuC7d
The Ignorant, Zombies: http://ul3.com/PP8Ez
Perception vs Reality: http://ul3.com/UcYb1
History: http://ul3.com/1rCFA
Chart Patterns: http://ul3.com/54VLV
Introduction to Technical Analysis. http://ul3.com/kcYCE

Writings.
INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL MARKETS & TRADING OPPORTUNITIES IN COMMODITY, CURRENCY, & FINANCIAL FUTURES. http://ul3.com/dAFWj
Revolutionary Transformation Ongoing. http://ul3.com/kcYCE
– Global Economic Collapse January 18, 2016


A quant speaks.

January 15, 2017

a quant speaks.

You have to change for the situation to change.
Inquiry | Understand Karma.

Just like success can be programmed, failures too, are running a program, which in affect is also a program, which exhibits success.

If you are repeating failing, then the cause is no one, but you, as you suffer from the affects of failure, due to your repetitive behaviour, if so, you can also be programmed to counteract those affects, to output the desired behaviour.

As a data analyst, this will make you, understand, that with the data presented, there is no coincidences, everything is well programmed, it’s just the data lying stale there, giving us our very own understanding, of what that is.

It also tells us, if yesterday is the same as today, then tomorrow will be the same, cause human behavior is the hardest to change.

Introduction to TECHNICAL ANALYSIS.

These human behaviours, repeatedly provides us with trends, outputted at various sites of BTAMSC.

This is what we do, at banking technologies Asia. We study data, data that is clean, data that is not obtained, but gathered, studying human behavior, in current form and the past, and we store this data, and call this dataset1 {history}.

On any single day, we analyse practically everything, gathered in real time, these bots of ours, operate like spiders, they dive deep into the web, to collect everything. To know everything, and archive it into history.

We keep track of the news, via snapwire.com.

To analyse to {dataset1}, we add another sets of new data into it, our bots gather and keep track of comments on blogs and all forms of social media, and we store these as {dataset2} as name them as feelings, or thoughts.

With this new data, a new preservative is added into the spectrum, to identify, his reality, vis perception, we scrub the two datasets, against each other.

We get a pattern. A pattern of truth.

Introduction to Chart Paterns.

Most importantly, we get to develop, predictive technology, intelligence is been gathered on our system, by giving us the predicative capability, of determining the next probable outcome, with the relative degree of safety, of potential pitfalls, challenges that may arise, in the fulfillment of the most probable outcome and what if; how; and other potentially required, questions, can be outputted from such a system. The most probable trends, our current condition of inquiry, are again outputted for scrubbing, at  http://dynamictrader.com And http://dynamictrader.org, sites we operate since 1998/-.

As such, we run multiple tools of information gathering systems and run them against each other, to determine the path of most probable outcome, this is a trend, that we are attempting to identify, the path of least resistance.

Analysis is a subject of repeated inquiry, that is what it is. The questioning and repeated inquiry, of what if, why, and every such question is the subject of such inquiry, then this is what is outputted, its called Intelligence, a state of {I Know more than you.}.

We then add into {another dataset3} , we call this economy. We track financial data, of all nature.(p)

Financial s Comparison Analysis.

KINDLY ACKNOWLEDGE THIS SITES DISCLAIMER of Dynamictrader before proceeding to any of its archived content. Our permission of granting you access, is depended and subjective based upon your agreement, to all our site terms and conditions, privacy and copyright terms and respective risk disclaimers. of which, you relieve us against any liabilities now or in the future, from the use and access of information, which are raw in nature in many cases, and you may suffer losses beyond your comprehension, leading to even cause of death, if you are walking across the street in deep confusion or doubt. 

INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL MARKETS & TRADING OPPORTUNITIES IN COMMODITY, CURRENCY, & FINANCIAL FUTURES – Archived on: Jan 2, 1995 | http://ul3.com/dAFWj  | http://dynamictrader.org/financial-markets-trading-opportunities-commodity-currency-financial-futures/

We believe in is a world without borders. A world without barriers and monopolies protecting the inefficient are been questioned. The days of segregation are behind us. Talent remains global and capital follows it. Redundant processes once identified become obsolete. Value creation meets success. Technology deployment demands speed!. Its Human Evolution not Revolution. Will you sink or swim?.

Progressively Evolve and aggregate extensible success, deploy existing resources and reinvent. Strategic deployment and high standards delivers value to your customers, our customers!. To redefine processes, Ask BTAMSC, Give us a Challenge!.  As Quants, Data is our best friend, without bias and corruption, we identify the inefficient and make them obsolete. For a Better World! Full of Love. For you, for us and our Lovely Planet.

BTAMSC is currently seeking partners to value add in the following joint ventures. Cloud based solution upload.asia, SocialNetwork platform planetic.com, Alternative News Media, snapwire.com, P2P+Merchant Solutions payments.asia, Virtual and Social Gifting redpacket.com, Ebooks Magazine Store emagbook.com, Expats community site, escapeartist.in, Free online educational platform elearningweb.com and virtual office platform keyteams.com.

Bidlease.com – Joint Venture Opportunities.

Learn more about our company, here; http://banktech.net

Our data is not for sale. For fear of corruption and bias.
We practically have no clients, want no clients.
We seek value adding, performance driven, systematically executing; joint venture partners.

Venture capital is available, meeting such criteria.

Our Services. We can help you;
ReInvent
ReInvent the Physical Presence with a Tasks Based Efficient Digital Office.

ReStructure
Restructure skills and resources assets globally with BTAMSC start to end solutions.

ReAlign
ReAlign resources to specific tasks, objectives to meet goals, outlined in milestones.

RePresent
RePresent in various online channels and grow to your full potential.


LINKS
Disclaimer. http://ul3.com/L30qH
Back to the Beginning. http://ul3.com/aeVUG
BTAMSC – http://ul3.com/vAqdH
The Greed: http://ul3.com/pUDgd
The Ignorant, Zombies: http://ul3.com/PP8Ez
History: http://ul3.com/1rCFA
Chart Patterns: http://ul3.com/54VLV
Introduction to Technical Analysis. http://ul3.com/kcYCE

Writings.
INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL MARKETS & TRADING OPPORTUNITIES IN COMMODITY, CURRENCY, & FINANCIAL FUTURES. http://ul3.com/dAFWj
Revolutionary Transformation Ongoing. http://ul3.com/kcYCE
– Global Economic Collapse  January 18, 2016


And Why;
Technopreneurship Development – Daniel Mankani. http://ul3.com/kcYCE
– Published Sep 2003. Pearson Education Asia

 

The Greed

December 21, 2016

The greed

Late 1998. A company called theglobe.com was listed on the Nasdaq. With no prior history of revenues and no prior track record the companies listing debut was very well accepted by the investment community, It was a technology company and was building communities on the internet and that what was the potential, theglobe closed up 606% on its first day of trading, not before doing a high of $97.00 (up 854%) before closing down at $63.50 from an initial price was $9.00.  Welcome to the new economy.

The term new economy came about due to the strong economic growth the US had experienced and was doing so without inflation, American Stock markets had gained approx 20% year on year since early 90’s and wealth was been created as never before, this was something new and against the basic principles of economics and a totally different environment.

Companies were setting up shops on the Internet from where they could service clients from anywhere. Reach anywhere, sell everywhere was the way going forward.

Huge corporations were creating business-2-business exchanges where they could save millions if not billions of dollars by eroding away inefficiencies in the marketplace and integration of business processes and supply chains managements helped them achieve this.

Financial brokers accepted trading instructions via the Internet and offered tools to traders and investors alike in managing their own monies. Clients were now trading directly on most exchanges at the lowest commission rates and with greatest transparencies.

Overall value was derived by the lowered cost of doing business and the boost in efficiency by the deployment of new technologies, supply chain software’s and integration ensured companies were connected and were able to make efficient use of their information.

It was an excellent environment for starting up a company and wealth creation was at its peak. Media companies such as CNBC and others ran reports of how technology was changing the way business was conducted and carried wealth watch reports on individuals who were richer by a billion dollars within a year.

It was a ride of hope for everyone and fear for the old economy, who feared a takeover by technology companies which could eventually make them extinct since they were slow to adapt to such dynamic changes at a speed well beyond their capabilities. Which in all sense meant more profits for technology companies as selling of their products meant more profits with ease.

The most single important thing demonstrated by the listing of the theglobe.com was the appetite of hungry investors for tech stocks, such an appetite that was not going to cool down anytime soon, everything paled in comparison as history showed Technology stocks offered returns far greater then traditional companies.

Day traders loved them for the volatility, individual investors found them interesting and the future in them and companies who were slow to build acquired them for the value they had missed to build themselves.

Merchant bankers were quick to recognize this fact and actively marketed their services and fed the public with just that, more tech companies with the potential of huge growth and profits. Which also meant huge revenues for themselves and greater returns on unsold positions. It was normal for companies to gain a minimum of 100% or more on their first days of public trading, anything less and it meant some thing had gone wrong.

Valuation was the name of the game and the objective was to ensure higher rounds of valuation, from seed stage to IPO there was ample capital available, typically seed rounds went at a few million dollars and future investment rounds such as the 3rd or 4th went for a few hundred million upon which the merchant bankers would step in and make arrangements to offer stock to the public and public listing valuations were based on what a similar company had achieved and how greater the potential was in future earnings.

With the Internet growing steadily and doubling in size every couple of months, it was not difficult to imagine, a substantial growing consumers base that businesses could sell to and cases of revenue projections were based on (traffic) advertisements banners, products and services that could be sold to this group.

While all this was happening most of the world couldn’t really grasp the phenomenon behind such higher valuations, nor could they understand what was driving the growth behind this sector but one thing was certain. Valuations were headed higher.

Stocks just as America Online, Yahoo and Amazon had already reached high valuation levels which was hard to justify using traditional approaches, but since no one knew what was their real value, a whole lot of investors had lost out ‘big time” on such opportunities.

With companies like Microsoft making Bill Gates as the single richest man in the world, there’s was no sign of the bull ride stopping soon, but still there was too much disbelief that it would end in a big crash and this was just 1998.

Disbelieve from Politicians, media, and hesitation by investors who followed value based investment strategies, questioned on how could a company stock appreciate and continue to rise when the company has not even made a single dollar in revenues and will continue losing money.

All looked well, but in reality things were actually quite difficult everywhere else, Asia was in trouble and recovering from the 1997 Asian Crisis, Russian financial markets had collapsed and Latin America was facing a lethal currency crisis.

The only problem was, the world needed an economic engine, which the US provided, it was a gigantic economic powerhouse with the combined power of Asia, Europe and Japan and is still is, the single biggest gainer in the new economy creating technology and exports it to the rest of the world.

The US blessed with a strong domestic market soaked up the excess supplies of the rest of the world. Goods from China, Japan, Eastern Europe and other parts of the world were making their way into the American markets and America kept on buying and provided that engine.

In the last two decades many countries has jumped into the capitalist bandwagon and were producing goods in excess capabilities in order to turn their economies around and while all this pointed to a deflationary effect everywhere else, in the US it figured as if there was no inflation while they still had growth.

It was a great time for everyone and but it would be nearing its end soon, as its said on the street “the markets will convince all before it turns, the smell of greed is most at tops and fear at bottoms”.  There were yet too many disbelievers of the new economy for the market to break so soon.

The turning point came in October 1998, When two noble price winners Mylon Scholes and Robert Merton and an ex Solomon brothers super trader John Meriwether were managing a fund called Long Term Capital Management.

Long term capital management was a hedge fund who arbitraged trading opportunities in Russian and Asian bonds and its trading strategy and model had just gone badly wrong, the problem was the fund was sizable enough to take down Wall Street with it, losses to the tune of 300 billion dollars were now been declared.

Questions were raised on Hedge funds regulations and how such a fund so sizable was allowed to operate. If liquidations were to take place of such a huge portfolio, it had the potential to take down Wall Street with it and create yet another huge financial disaster.

This is what the Federal Reserve feared most and they had to avert this for now as it was too early, Asia and Japan were yet to recover, Europe didn’t show signs of providing that global engine and most important of all, Y2K millennium fears were fast approaching whose effects on the global economy were yet unknown.

Long Term Capital Management was in long-term trouble and a panic followed on the markets. LTCM main problem was caused as Russia had devalued the Rouble and declared a moratorium on future debt repayments, this lead to deterioration of credit worthiness of many emerging market bonds and increases in spreads, Which LTCM had bet against.

Most markets around the world plunged following Wall Street.  With the SP500 and Dow Jones off by almost 22% in a few days. It was chaotic and scary and looked like the end of the world is near.  Disbelievers cheered and re-iterated their claims that indeed the US was a huge asset bubble ready to be burst and they had given ample warnings, which no one had given attention to and all this could have been avoided.

To their surprise, the Feds kept the market tuned to their upside, it was yet to early for the timing of a financial collapse and the federal reserve moved and created a rescue package to bail out LTCM. Banks were instructed by the Feds to give LTCM more money in exchange for equity into the bankrupt fund.

In addition the Federal Reserve cut interest rates aggressively to ensure the rescue package created for LTCM had its desired effect and the markets turned.

It was a victory for buy and hold strategist and optimist of the markets and they called it the New Economy.  Stories were abound of people who had become rich buying on every downturn and this time around were no different.

All this boosted investor confidence even further and the Feds was looked upon as a savoir in the markets who wouldn’t just let the markets collapse as wealth is been created and distributed at all levels within the economy.

The Feds simply didn’t want to create two much of a financial stress as the millennium fears (Y2K) were indeed for real and any major financial disruptions had to be delayed for now.

The single most importance of the LTCM effect was the confidence boost and the trust in the markets, everyone investors, businesses, workers and consumers were all pleased with the wealth effect, why disrupt the party? Which had just began and was on its final path to the upside.

Something else spectacular was happening, the Nasdaq would now gain 400 percent in the next couple of months and euphoria had begun.

LTCM Bailout, Market bottoms and huge rally, the greedy george soros also turns long.

Greed was taking over. Such greed that there was adamant confidence and trust in the markets which would continue even after the market had collapsed.

Traditional investing was out, in was new investing, day traders would gather in chat rooms and trade over rumors.  Street café’s were specifically set-up to provide traders with trading information and execution access, where they would gather everyday to work but on their own monies.

New electronic communication networks (ECN’s) were set up to provide traders with the much-required liquidity, which lacked in technology and Nasdaq stocks.

Fears of competition from ECN’s made stock exchanges to relax their rules at all levels, listing requirements were eased and secondary exchanges started to spring up everywhere.

From Tokyo to Israel stock exchanges allowed new tech start up’s to list and raise capital from the public with ease, no previous revenue track records were required for new companies but they had to be in technology.

For the exchanges they wanted to compete with the Nasdaq, which was famous for technology companies and was the favorite among all others, Investor appetite was greater and start-ups could get the best valuations, which these new exchanges lacked.

This was the new economy, yearly growth no inflation and success was determined by investors for their companies that had achieved IPO status.

Money was everywhere. Companies with no prior records of managing funds in private equity were calling themselves Venture Capitalists.  One such story was of a fund manager who after losing massive amounts of money during the Asian crisis decided to take a holiday in the Caribbean, once there he noticed young 20 something individuals flying in with their own jets and having a great time. This bothered him and he asked one of them what do you do?

The answer he got is “we are technopreneurs and we are rich because our company got listed, but this is nothing you should see our financiers”.  The fund manager quickly cut his holiday short and returned to Hong Kong, once there he raised 50 million dollars and started up his own venture capital company.

It was later known that this venture capital firm had hit a home run and his original 50 million had turned into a billion dollars in about 12 months time.

Such were the days, where Venture capitalists and Angel investors went around sourcing deals in private equity and on the other hand raised cash themselves either thru a back door listing or from high net worth individuals.

Also joining in were Stock traders who made handsome profits purchasing stock at listing prices and re-selling later on, soon realized there is much more to gain if they were able to get closer to the value chain themselves and began sourcing deals in very early stage companies themselves

The criteria was simple, the company had to be a technology idea and have some commercial viability, most important of all the companies management had to have their eyes on an IPO and to fulfill these objectives, funds were provided to them to build, conduct R&D and ready till the stage until where a venture capitalist would come in at.

Founders everywhere started to quit their stable jobs and set out to set up their own Internet empires and it was perfect. Good news followed and the media reported.

Elsewhere established larger companies like Microsoft, AOL and YAHOO were already fighting battles among themselves trying to emerge as market leaders in the Internet community space. The idea was simple; one who owned the community had a massive competitive advantage to market to those consumers.

A space where Microsoft was weak in, with its existing monopoly in the desktop and personal pc market, Microsoft soon realized potential pitfalls the Internet had brought about for them and needed to scale up fast in building its web community platform.

The threat for Microsoft came from companies like AOL who had a ready pool of consumers through its ISP service made Microsoft to search for solution.

Just about that time, Hotmail was actively building their reach, the web first free web based email service had amassed a huge client base by providing free email service to individuals in India, China, USA and practically around the world.

Individuals who couldn’t afford a personal computer or who found difficulty in getting their own email services from their ISP, looked upon hotmail as the new medium to connect with friends, families and associates across the globe at practically no cost.

Email been the most popular communication platform on the Internet provided Hotmail with a strength and scale to deploy viral marketing techniques to build up their user base.  Hotmail would just keep on growing as users were advertising on behalf of Hotmail every time they send an email to their friends and associates.  With 9 million established users, Hotmail became a target for acquisition by Microsoft, who originally offered 150 million dollars for the two year old start-up, which Hotmail management team refuse, eventually four months later in December 1997 Microsoft paid Four hundred million dollars for Hotmail.

The initial four founders of Hotmail became very rich in identifying this opportunity and capital provided by Menlo Ventures and Draper Fisher Jurvetson (venture firms) had scored a big home run in a game of merger and acquisitions that had only just began. Total investments in Hotmail is estimated to be less than 15 million, with Hotmail going for it’s forth round of investments raising 3 million in just April 1997.

For the venture capitalist that had been approached by the hotmail team for investments earlier on, had now seen the light and it created a feeling of unhappiness for them. Not been able to identify an opportunity knocking on your doors is a big miss, which very few individuals will ever forget. Since then everything on the Internet with the word first mover became first mover’s advantage.

Valuations in the stock market continued to the upside and this gave public listed companies the currency they needed to purchase brands, concepts, competitors, and even expand and develop new markets.

The community building spree continued and everyone out there wanted a piece of action in the community space, more deals followed. AOL cut deals with Bell Atlantic, purchased Netscape for 4.2 billion and this spilled towards other ISP’s who wanted to fight off competition did the same,  (AT) @Home another ISP moved to acquire Excite for 6.7 billion and Geocities a company that provided free web pages for community was acquired by Yahoo in a stock deal worth 3.56 billion.

In a buying spree, the public loved technology stocks for their upside and the promise of the new economy, it was normal for firms to double or triple in prices on first days of trading.

Everyone in essence was getting richer. Real wealth was been created and distributed all levels. The Feds to a certain level ensued all things been equal the show must go on. Japan was still in trouble and if the global engine stops we all might get into a deep recession.

By Mid 1999, the frenzy just caught on further and everything related to technology was hot. The most important effect felt in the economy were the changes in the media, who till now reported on a bubble collapse in the US, were now providing a basis for the new world, economy and changes made by technopreneurs.

They ran articles of successful technopreneurs, covered events and even set up their own Internet ventures. They talked about technopreneurs who were making a difference, technopreneurs who willing to risk all for pursuing their dreams and fulfilling their visions.

Technopreneurs Who could access capital, turn their ideas into reality and list on the markets, turning original millions of investor’s money into probably billions, all in a matter of a six months.

The media had turned from being bearish to extremely bullish on technology all within a matter of six months and the markets loved that, merchant’s bankers praised them and sold more stock.

Governments everywhere were threatened by the these new corporations as they were been build, they were big fast and moved quickly, their eyes opened up to the billionaires been created in the west and they wanted a piece of the internet action, they called it knowledge based economy and created special IT trade zones which allocated vast amounts of national resources to start-ups for a promise of putting these countries on the world software map.

Old economy rules were thrown out and new policies were put in place to accommodate technopreneurs, bankruptcy was now considered hip and in order to facilitate adventurers to come again and take a shot at the business world once again, Bankruptcies laws were amended, allowing previous bankrupt individuals to reclaim their credit in society and start all over again. In some countries they even presented an award to individuals who were once bankrupt and had fought back against all odds to become successful once again.

This was truly one of the best times in history to setup a company and venture and this is what happened, New 18 year olds were setting up companies and were looked upon on as becoming the next the bill gates, corporate mission statements read, “we like building companies and have fun in doing so and traditional bankers went to office in t-shirts instead of the traditional suit and tie’s.

Company’s success was determined by how many investors they had and higher burn rates were considered growth, capital promised growth in market share and there was plenty.

Venture capitalist ignored the fact and demanded market share and exposure while sacrificing revenues and their targets. Been profitable was not in fashion and growing big fast was the way going forward.  They wanted start-ups who could scale and become industry leaders and the start-ups let them hear just that.

The money flowed back into the economy and everything with dot COM was hot, not a single day could pass without one been bombarded via big billboards, colorful busses and TV advertisements shouting out DOT COM.

Suppliers wanted them for their cash, employees looked upon them for success and investors wanted their equity which was worth more then gold and were willing to trade for them with services.

Landlords offered free rentals, lawyers, accountants offered their services and practically everything could be purchased with a option of a private equity, traditional media giants picked up equity in companies in exchange of free air time and prime time advertisement spots.

The logic was simple for investors, “I know the price I am paying is absurdly high, but somewhere out there is a greater fool than I am who will, when the time comes will pay an even higher price” The tech bubble doesn’t burst until the greatest fool of all has brought” they said.

For start-ups it was even simpler, the market was singing their tunes. Every day was party time, either a networking session event or a posh new dot com launch would be held, investors would come around as gullible as they were, looking to meet some promising start up’s to give them their hard earned money.

We were approaching the year end and fears of y2k had subside as money could take care of everything and there was too much of it around, new IT spending boom prevailed and billions of dollars was spend in upgrading of IT networks to ensure trouble free transition into the millennium. This added fuel to the lofty prices of the stock valuations.

Optimism was highest at all stages and so was greed. Practically every traditional company now had their own venture arm for investments into start-ups and for those who were lesser financed and had existing inventories and resources to trade set up their own incubation center’s all for the share in private equity of a dot com.

Non tech related companies began to realized the value behind the dot COM name and started branding themselves by adding a net or com to their businesses, with ease of listing for new tech companies, loss making companies, factories, manufactures, and property developers who were in dire straits and in need of capital could now secure financing through listing on these new tech markets and were partially exiting their positions while the gullible investor wanted more.

Elsewhere companies were losing talent to start-up companies, bright individuals with good careers were quitting their companies for a punt at the Internet world and the media sang glory of technopreneurs who were making a difference.

Universities and IT training centers followed the boom and starting educating individuals in technology, as it was hot and there was a huge demand for people who could build and manage technology for non tech savvy companies.

In countries like India billboards read “ 25000 programmers needed in USA, Germany and Singapore. Confirmed Jobs, Six Months training and everywhere else it was no different.

The Schools, universities and training centers started to offer courses in e-commerce, dot.com, technopreneurship and the likes. They were churning out individuals by the thousands and the Americans were employing them.

Manpower services companies were set up to facility this trade, which is no greater then the body shopping business but there was demand and someone had to do this job.

With rigid laws for employment and a constant shift in technology focus, most companies didn’t want to employ full time staff and opted for a contract with the manpower services companies to hire people from them on contractual or project basis, they paid good money for each individual sometimes far exceeding the salaries of local staff which were hard to find and again for companies who didn’t want long term liabilities this offered a perfect solution.

This contributed the basis for revenues for most Indian listed technology companies who instead of building software solutions were nothing more but a manpower services company, expected gain on each staff contracted sometimes exceeded a couple of thousand dollars each month and the idea was simple the more people I ship the more money is there to be made.  On Average four to five thousand programmers were shipped monthly if you multiply that with a two thousand dollars each, you get a very nice number for revenues, which could also make up a very nice case for a public listing process.

In other areas in India a software solutions firm at one time with a revenue base of 150M gained a market capitalization of 34 billion dollars as they were one of the few software companies from India listed on the Nasdaq and as most fund managers who follow herd instincts found this company as the only one with huge value in them.

As most old economy companies made the plunge into technology they lacked expertise in this space, then came along technical executives who could assist them in achieving those corporate goals, prices escalated further and so did salaries but this time the companies had to also part with options into the new company.

One particular incident worth mentioning is the IPO listing of a company out of Hong Kong called TOM.com, TOM.com was conceived by Mr Li Ka Shing, the richest man in Hong Kong with previous businesses in construction, real estate, utilities and telecommunications, there was something lacking, no dot.com, so Mr Li conceived an idea to create his own multimedia empire and tom.com would be it.Such was the euphoria that thousands of investors woke up as early as 5.00 AM to queue up outside of a bank for application forms for the initial public offering of shares in tom.com, which was a subsidiary of Cheung Kong Holdings Ltd. and Hutchison Whampoa Ltd both Mr Li’s companies. Tom.com was listed in Feb 2000; the estimated public float was US$1.47 Billion. According to Hong Kong police some three hundred thousand people had joined the queue.

The greedy come out in crowds, all wanting a piece of the action, just near the top. An estimated 300 thousand people lined up since early morning. Tom.com IPO

Elsewhere in Malaysia the government build up a whole new colony for technology companies and called it Multimedia Super Corridor and offered first class facilities for technopreneurs, besides these other benefits included Venture capital, 10 years of tax holidays and a chance for these companies to bid for government related contracts.

Everyone wanted to duplicate silicon valley and they attributed the success of America upon ready available capital and the risk averse entrepreneurs needed to innovate.

Disbelievers of the new economy were one by one convinced by the new economy and by March 2000, everyone who had not joined the rally to the upside was on the bandwagon.

Funds, who bet against technology, started investing in them and changed their strategies. Tiger Fund, Warren Buffet and George Soros all previous disbelievers now had investments in them and were now bullish on the future then ever. To them it just didn’t make any sense, but when you are wrong you can’t hang on for long.

By now most pension funds which were supposed to ensure livelihood of many individuals in their golden years were invested in technology, Universities, Private trusts, hedge and mutual funds were punting on them and in fact the US government was also considering parting with its citizens social securities funds to get a piece of the technology action.

It was these chains of events and timing that outlined a near term collapse.

Between 1999 and March 2000 most bearish funds made record purchases of technology stocks and the Nasdaq 100 was now 400% up from its LTCM lows.

And the media, behind the curve, on hindsight tried to make sense of everything.

There were more bullish books on the subject of investing then any other time, two books in particular worth mentioning were released which outlined continued market growth “Dow Jones to hit 36000 and 40000 respectively” and famous author of liar’s poker Michael Louis released the New New thing where he writes about new internet billionaire Jim Clark, the founder of Silicon Graphics and Netscape and who was going to turn health care on its ear by launching Healtheon, which would bring the vast majority of the industry’s transactions online, After coming up with the basic idea for Healtheon, securing the initial seed money, and hiring the people to make it happen, Clark concentrated on the building of Hyperion, a sailboat with a 197-foot mast, whose functions are controlled by 25 SGI workstations (a boat that, if he wanted to, Clark could log onto and steer–from anywhere in the world).

It was the timing again of Michaels story, whose previous book coincided with the bond market collapse of the eighties where he describes the height of the junk bond craze and the atmosphere of competitiveness and the vast rewards everyone was reaping as a result of that boom.

Greed had taken over.

On April 3rd 2000, the Nasdaq broke down. But this was not before establishing a high of 4816 on March 24 2000. A gain of close to 500% from its LTCM lows.

And the once poster child for the rise of the Internet Bubble Theglobe plunged to a low of 19 cents, a staggering 99.8 percent from the company’s all-time high of $97, which it reached on its first day of trading and was given the de-listing notice by Nasdaq for failing to recover to the required $1 minimum bid price. It currently trades on the OTC- Bulletin Board (Feb 2001)

 

technopreneurship_Daniel-Mankani

Technopreneurship – The Successful Entrepreneur in the New Economy – Daniel Mankani. Published 2003. Pearson Education Asia – All rights, copyright reserved Daniel Mankani { ISBN0-13-046545-3 }

Chapter The Greed >>> Technopreneurship-The Successful Entrepreneur In The New Economy.

LINKS
Disclaimer. http://ul3.com/L30qH
Back to the Beginning. http://ul3.com/aeVUG
BTAMSC – http://ul3.com/vAqdH
The Greed: http://ul3.com/pUDgd
The Ignorant, Zombies: http://ul3.com/PP8Ez
History: http://ul3.com/1rCFA
Chart Patterns: http://ul3.com/54VLV
Introduction to Technical Analysis. http://ul3.com/kcYCE

Writings.
INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL MARKETS & TRADING OPPORTUNITIES IN COMMODITY, CURRENCY, & FINANCIAL FUTURES. http://ul3.com/dAFWj
Revolutionary Transformation Ongoing. http://ul3.com/kcYCE
– Global Economic Collapse  January 18, 2016


And Why;
Technopreneurship Development – Daniel Mankani. http://ul3.com/kcYCE
– Published Sep 2003. Pearson Education Asia

 

Technopreneurship Development – Daniel Mankani

December 9, 2012
technopreneurship_Daniel-Mankani

Technopreneurship – The Successful Entrepreneur in the New Economy – Daniel Mankani

{Reprinted with permission “Technopreneurship – The Successful Entrepreneur In the New Economy” – by Author Daniel Mankani, to purchase this book, proceed to amazon.}

A Role for Society in Technopreneurship Development, a chapter written in 2002, explains the creative destructive forces at work in practically every aspect of human life and the reasoning for the massive confusion, leading up to revolutions, lack of employment opportunities and governments fiscal deficits. Technology is usually blamed for making the world a smaller place, the writing was on the wall since the late nineties, this chapter refreshes our memories.

Daniel Mankani is the founding CEO of BTAMSC and drives strategic decisions of the company, currently he is writing, “Knowledge Based Economy, Its Evolution, Not Revolution, the new prelude should update Technopreneurship-The Successful Entrepreneur in the New Economy, an often quoted text book, part of  universities diploma/degree syllabus on technopreneurship courses.

 To download PDF version of this chapter, click here.

A Role for Society in Technopreneurship Development

The economies of industries are already in a grave recession, the addition of the information economy has further diluted its potential value and the collapse of the NASDAQ has in essence killed all consumers and businesses growth potential.

Today, we stand at important crossroads, the hope is for information technology to address the inefficiencies that are visible in today’s marketplace and provide us with a platform to jumpstart and revive the global economy.

The NASDAQ collapse was a boon in disguise, it showed us the importance of value and reminded us about the rallies of greed and their sustainability, the only regret we have today is the rally should have been checked and shouldn’t have got out of hand.

In this process, the move to the upside on world markets made us to forget the basis of economic growth, made us to think we are invincible and made us to build up huge layers of inefficiencies, debt and excesses in the system, which we are now fighting hard to correct.

Today, we have more of everything, we have more food on the face of the planet, we have more technology then we can use, we have more houses then people can be sheltered and all that we lack is market driven demand to soak them up

On the other hand, the involvement of Eastern Europe, China, India and a dozen of other countries in the capitalist markets in the last two decades is not helping us either, all of these countries are churning and dumping goods and services on the world markets faster than any demand we could build up, this in essence has then contributed to a disastrous dilution effect, which is of little value as it destroys wealth.

In turn, the dilution era has effected consumers and businesses spending patterns and they have tighten their belts and have developed a wait and see attitude towards prices, with the rationale, why buy now? When tomorrow goods are only going to get cheaper? The tomorrow they look forward to may never materialize as the days thereafter prices are expected to head even lower.

The old routes of economic growth and prosperity have also been increasingly blocked, the earlier days economic model which once seemed rock solid do not function anymore, the export oriented growth model, which most Asian countries implemented are now in doubt and the once successful Japanese model has faltered and all this is very disturbing.

What we are experiencing is the collapse of all demand as we know it and this has affected practically every business, with businesses in trouble then the question is, who is going to employ our workers, who is going to pay those taxes and how are we going to keep the engines of the economy humming along fine.

The answer may just be in front of our eyes.  TECHNOPRENEURS> we need more of the technopreneur to build world-class companies. We need technopreneurs to build solutions that will spur growth and demand so excesses can be soaked up with ease and we need technopreneurs to build up the information economy whose value will benefit the economies of industries the world over.

In a speech on “Structural Change in the New Economy”, delivered to the National Governors Association on July 11 2000, Federal Reserve Chairman Allan Greenspan argues, “it is the proliferation of information technology throughout the economy that makes the current period appear so different from preceding decades.”

He continues by mentioning ’“One result of the more-rapid pace of IT innovation has been a visible acceleration of the process that noted economist Joseph Schumpeter many years ago termed ‘creative destruction’—the continuous shift in which emerging technologies push out the old.” Among the advantages of the New Economy is the ability of corporations to generate a flood of information in mini- seconds, allowing them to “reduce unnecessary inventory and dispense with labor and capital redundancies.”

He highlights to us, the speed and efficiency of the integrated supply chain in the new economy and its greatness whose effects can be felt not in the matter of months of years but within days of major economic shifts throughout the whole system, and it’s this efficiency that in turn pinches the man on the street, who controls the majority of all spending and capital.

Another key point the Fed Chairman highlighted was the manner in which the supply chain had been integrated at all levels within the economy, he points out that it’s this efficient supply chain in the global economy that removes the redundancies in the marketplace, if so then this also means majority of the world population are been weeded out and are becoming obsolete.

In all respects these have seen the markets becoming transparent than ever before, the consumer is more demanding than ever before and competition today is so fierce than ever before.

The effects of globalization and the dynamic movements of capital are greater than ever before and the effects, sentiments of the global financial markets are having a greater impact on economies than ever before.

These are in essence some of the challenges for countries and their respective governments for they are wondering how they could retain human capital and their intellectual contribution for a better tomorrow.

They are wondering how they could lead their people out of the economic adversity for the economies of industries and demands have collapsed.  For they have to understand that it’s the technopreneur who develops innovation and that attracts capital and it’s him who holds the key of our economic prosperity for tomorrow.

As society we have a major role to play to assist in the technopreneur’s development and that of technopreneurship, we have to create a cohesive environment, where innovation can be breed, tested and where capital can be assessed so that the technopreneur of today can be market leaders of tomorrow.

We have to encouraging, forgiving towards their deeds and caring towards their needs for they we are breeding leaders who have will command market share and determine how we compete on an International level.

For capital is global and it’s the single most denominating factor that affects our lives, our assets and therefore our future generations and it’s this capital that is attracted to the technopreneur and his world-class company.

It’s the technopreneur’s world class company in our local stock markets that attracts capital and it’s this capital whose movements are swift and are a performance indicator of our underlying economy, increasingly this capital and technology that used to pour in from the first world is also slowing, causing forecasters to systematically downgrade all of our future economic prospects.

With the old foundations of success gone, Technopreneurs, research and development programs, creative capital, and responsible information technology incubating institutions are quickly replacing and building the economic growth foundations for the twenty first century.

We as society, have to ensure we have proper educational processes in homes, schools and universities, if we are to breed technopreneurs, as parents we have to teach them to be giving, responsible, reasonable and allow them in the freedom to express themselves, allow them to destroy the old in creation of the new and most importantly we have to teach them the power of knowledge and how to be able to harness it.

At schools we have to teach them subjects of science instead of politics, we have to show them books of mathematics instead of geography and we have to hold the creators of innovations high, instead of those who capitalize on them.

At universities we have to lead them to the problems and provide them with a foundation in addressing them and not solve problems, which do not exist. We have to teach them the importance of efficiency and the drive behind market demands.

Our professors have to be learned but learned from experience instead of books themselves, because they are good for reference and history, but are static, we need the dynamism and the learned to teach them the joys, pains, prerequisites of a startup cycle and impart to them strategies of management, business and creative destruction.

Our employers have to work harder and weed out any signs of negativity, since productivity, efficiency and creativity directly suffers from them. Our employers have to impart to them stories of persistence and success of the old economy and teach them the importance of teamwork and corporate culture.

For we want to breed visionaries who we want to command and rule the world, cause these are the visionaries, who will capitalize on the great opportunity created by globalization and the Internet.

In the 21st century the recipe for success is knowledge based, not resource based and for those who recognize this, knowledge is the new basis of wealth.

Such is the new wealth that it’s powerful and movable for it can make a country success and while taking the away the success from another. As a society our protection is the buildup and distribution of this wealth for we need to create a system for those who want to access it.

For we need to build up facilities for research and development and creative capital to support them, we need our leaders of yesterday years to assist the leaders of tomorrow. We need our businesses to provide technopreneur’s with the platform for research, development and deployment, so that problems can be viewed, addressed and solutions developed, for they need businesses to recognize that if they are successful, collectively their success comes together.

Businesses need to understand, startups require creditability and require support on the local grounds before they can make way to the global levels, businesses need to understand that technology by itself is no competitive advantage and knowledge is never equal at all levels.

They need to understand that any solution delivered by any big institution has the same components as that of a startup’s offering and at times contracts awarded to big name companies may have been developed by a startup as part of a third party outsourcing agreement. They need to understand that brand name software doesn’t necessarily contain brand type value and lastly they need to understand that technopreneurs are among the best for the job, as they crave for your success more than the businesses themselves.

Businesses need to understand that technopreneurs are no threat to them, but are revolutionary’s implementing change necessary for our evolution, they are required to study the inefficiencies, implement the new and provide a basis for tomorrows growth, despite of this, businesses are still staffed with negativity which fear and that their end is near.

The negativity in the economy is so great, that everyone who accepts change expects risk and risk is what many cannot afford. Businesses need to change this or bring in fresh blood to create this cohesive environment, for the longer the delay. Longer will be its pain.

Businesses need to accept failure and respect those who have failed. One of the many complains that technopreneurs have today, is that they are not accepted back into society as they have failed, they are riddled and feared, and after all who would want to employ an ex-dot comer or a technopreneur that has done it all.

The technopreneur has figured out his income, raised capital, strategize his operations and most importantly has determined his own fate by dynamic adapting to the changes in the environment, on the other hand we have a manager who lives in the shelter of his employer and fears holdings the reins of change and accepting a technopreneur is accepting change.

Businesses need to figure all this out and if they have to creativity destroy the old chains of command and bring in the dynamic, motivated and enthusiastic fresh blood in the organization, theirs choice should very well be the technopreneur again.

For their fear that once the technopreneur has figured them out they will become obsolete, they need to realize if one’s value is lesser then their cost no matter which role they play, they will surely become obsolete.

For they need to understand that the technopreneurs asset is that of knowledge and knowledge is the new wealth, it’s intangible and movable. For they need to understand that never before have we leveraged on the value of knowledge and it was investments in knowledge and intellectual property that made the richest man in this world.

Never before have we seen the richness of knowledge and despite all this, we still see banks refusing to finance its worth and venture capital firms unable to gauge its worth.

For we need to build up the network from which capital can be assessed. Angels, banks and venture capital firms have important roles to play, as without the required capital, development and deployment is in question. While innovation and knowledge is the part of the mind, soul and passion, it requires capital as oxygen to function.

Banks today are still stuck in their glory days and with the dot com collapse they have turned so negative that liquidity has been squeezed from the system, they are still waiting for the hey days where there were millions of dollars requirements towards industry development. For their fail to understand that industrial activity is at a standstill and all that was required to be developed has already been developed.

They rather take the chances of pushing more credit cards in the hands of the consumer, for they think the consumer is safer. They fail to realize the potential of the knowledge based economy and fail to see the potential of the technopreneur.

They still ask for tangible assets for financing, failing to realize the technopreneurs assets are intangible, what is required of them is the need to build a valuation model for intellectual property that ensure their commercial viability, similar to the manner they do with real estate property, they should ask for patents and customer endorsements before they lend money.

It’s the same with venture capital companies, for they are staffed with ex-bankers who don’t really understand their own business and they don’t understand the business of the technopreneur. They want to see fool proof business plans and want sure win guarantee’s, for their fail to understand that it’s not the plan but the execution that counts and they need to know that execution has to be dynamic so as to determine its success.

They need to understand the investment and its larger opportunity and place their bets on the execution strategy and the team. They need to understand that deals that look very good are seldom the ones who are winners. They need to understand that the number of times they can place a bet, the lesser the risk of ruin and larger the probability of wins. For they are the venture capitalist and becoming a banker is where their failure lies.

It’s the same with Angels. For they want to invest and they want the best price and best bargain, they fail to understand the potential and they fail to understand a hundred percent of zero is zero and five percent of one hundred million is still five million, for most angels deals that have collapsed, the reason has always been equity distribution and valuation and finally when the angel did invest at his preferred rate he got his deal but he lost his money due to his greed.

Angels need to understand the viability of the project and the value the bring on the table, for their expertise is needed in early stages and its value is greater than money, If its pure capital and then the angel and the technopreneur should focus on the potential return instead of the size of holdings.

While all this is our recipe for the new economy, which is within our grasp, its execution is the key and its implementation is necessary. It requires consistency, sincerity and a multi facet strategy and who else but the local governments have the strengths to be the driving force for such implementation.

[1]As stated by International Advisor and Consultant, Dr Khalid Abdullah Tariq Al-Mansour, he says, Empty Sincerity, however noble, is no substitute for self-sacrificing, visionary, disciplined and committed political leadership. Relevant public and private education, in all its many challenging forms, must be continuous touted, reinvented and improved. In this regard, special stress must be placed upon “knowledge-based” science, math, logic and reason, technology, morality, engineering and creative strategic planning. In the process, every functional institution of society must be co-opted and given concrete, achievable assignments.

Dr Khalid comments are held in the highest regards and as an advisor to governments; he understands well what the governments have to do in order to turn around their respective economies. For it’s the government that hold the reins of economic growth and prosperity in their hands, it’s them who have to embark on a plan for technopreneurship development. For they are the ones who have to ensure there is adequate capital and resources available for the technopreneur.

For they have to understand that we are in a deflationary era and excess supply of money in the system today doesn’t have the same effects as during inflationary times, they have to ensure money supply is distributed at all levels within the system and draining money out of the system during economic fallouts will head us into a depression.

They have to understand that providing capital to venture companies is not enough, they have to ensure that the money is put into real ventures. They have to understand investments in development without the user base and acceptance of that development is of little value.

Lastly they have to understand they have to put their trust into technopreneurs who are the leaders of tomorrow, but before that as they are leaders themselves, they were once lead by another who showed them the ways.
/END

To buy the complete version of this book in print, please proceed to Amazon.com

[embeddoc url=”https://idealbroker.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Technopreneurship-Unedited-Manuscript-2002-Daniel-Mankani.pdf” download=”all” viewer=”google”]


[1] Quoted from Asia Pacific, Information and Communication Technology (APIT) January 2002 issue. Feature – Lessons for the Future, Dr Khalid Abdullah Tariq Al-Mansour.


LINKS
Disclaimer. http://ul3.com/L30qH
Back to the Beginning. http://ul3.com/aeVUG
BTAMSC – http://ul3.com/vAqdH
The Greed: http://ul3.com/pUDgd
The Ignorant, Zombies: http://ul3.com/PP8Ez
History: http://ul3.com/1rCFA
Chart Patterns: http://ul3.com/54VLV
Introduction to Technical Analysis. http://ul3.com/kcYCE
INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL MARKETS & TRADING OPPORTUNITIES IN COMMODITY, CURRENCY, & FINANCIAL FUTURES. http://ul3.com/dAFWj
Revolutionary Transformation Ongoing. http://ul3.com/kcYCE
– Global Economic Collapse  January 18, 2016


And Why;
Technopreneurship Development – Daniel Mankani. http://ul3.com/kcYCE
– Published Sep 2003. Pearson Education Asia